What is the Purpose of Human life

We begin this inquiry not by looking for an answer to “What is the purpose of my life?” but by looking at the one who is asking the question. It is a process in which the purpose-seeking individual itself is resolved. In the Vedāntic tradition, every inquiry must start with the Pramātā – the knower. If the instrument is out of tune, the music will always be discordant, regardless of the song.

Human beings commonly seek meaning or purpose in external facets of life, such as their children, family, patriotism, religion, beliefs, and ideologies. However, a universal experience across all of humanity, regardless of their diverse beliefs, ideologies, religions, or personal psychological makeup, is a persistent lack of true fulfilment.

1. The Tamburā of Wanting: The Background Hum

Imagine a musician playing a complex rāga (melody). The music features varied melodies, intricate rhythms, and shifting notes, but underpinning it all is the steady, unwavering drone of the Tamburā. Whether the musician expresses joy or sorrow, the Tamburā remains constant; it is the foundation for all the music.

In life, our specific desires – “I want a degree,” “I want a spouse,” “I want a promotion,” “I want my children to succeed” – are the “songs,” or rāgās. We often mistakenly believe the problem is with the song itself, thinking a change in the melody will bring perfection. However The attention has to be placed on the persistent tone of “I want.”

Pūjya Swāmī Dayānanda Saraswatī refers to this as the “Wanting Mind.” From birth to death, the objects of desire change (a toy at five, a house at thirty, health at seventy), but the state of being a “wanter” remains constant. The “what” varies, but the fundamental “that I want” continues.  I always want something fundamentally because I perceive myself as lacking. This self-perception of lacking is equivalent to believing that “all is not right with me.” When a person sees themselves this way, the desire to fulfil that perceived lack becomes inevitable.

The core human problem is a fundamental dissatisfaction present in everyone, often masked by various distractions. This underlying discontent becomes evident when distractions are absent. To confront the true feeling of inner lack, one must eliminate all distractions: devices, people, and hobbies. Alone on a quiet Sunday, the absence of engagement reveals a dominant sense of scarcity. This is the fundamental fear we constantly escape through modern society’s myriad distractions. Whether faced directly or buried, this underlying dissatisfaction with oneself is a constant, universal human experience.

2. The Triple Seeking: Reducing the Chaos

Human activity appears chaotic and diverse. One person is running for political office, another is saving for a pilgrimage, the third is looking for a better apartment, and the fourth is looking for a partner. Fundamentally, all human desires or pursuits can be categorised into four.

  1. Artha (Security): The need to feel safe. This includes food, clothing, money, and social standing. It is the struggle against the fear of “not having” in the present or in the future.
  2. Kāma (Pleasure/Peace): The need for sensory or psychological enjoyment. This is the struggle against boredom, pain, and inner restlessness. Fundamentally, Kama is about making your life pleasant without a single moment of unpleasantness.
  3. Dharma (Ethics/Order): The need to be a grown-up person, to love and be loved, and to live in harmony at the level of the individual, family, society, and relationships.  Dharma is essentially the aspiration to live a harmonious life, one that involves peaceful co-existence within the cosmic order.

Human beings typically pursue a life purpose by seeking to balance three core desires: Security (Artha), Pleasure (Kama), and Ethics (Dharma). However, a crucial characteristic of all these pursuits is their inherent limitation – both the means and the ends are finite. Your ability to achieve Security is limited by your personal capabilities and the finite nature of your actions. The Pleasure you can derive from any experience is restricted by your body’s limited capacity to process experiences and manage its internal chemistry. Similarly, your capacity for Ethics – maintaining internal harmony and creating harmony in relationships – is highly constrained by your finite physical, mental, and emotional reserves.

This leads to a clear conclusion: because the fundamental nature of these desires and the actions taken to achieve them are limited, a finite action, even if repeated finite number of times, can only ever yield a finite result. The pursuit of Security, Pleasure, and Ethics, while fundamental, cannot lead to an unlimited or ultimate purpose because they are inherently bounded. And a sense of lack can never be fulfilled by going this route.

Finite + Finite = Finite.

If you are a limited, “small” being, and you add a limited amount of money, a limited amount of pleasure, and a limited amount of moral “good luck,” the total is still Finite. You have moved from a “poor finite” to a “rich finite,” but you have not reached the Pūrṇatva (Fullness) that the heart is still crying for. The “wanting” remains because the subject/I/Ahamkara has not changed.

3. The Error of Identity: The Bachelor – to – Father Struggle

Why do we keep adding things? Because we are suffering from a deep-seated error of Identity. We believe that “I” am not acceptable as I am. Therefore, life becomes a series of attempts to “swap” the current “I” for a better one.

Consider the bachelor who is dissatisfied. He thinks, “The problem is that I am a bachelor.” He seeks a girl, but Vedānta reveals that he doesn’t actually want the girl; he wants the transformation of himself. He wants to swap the “Inadequate Bachelor – I” for the “Adequate Husband – I.”

Once he becomes a husband, the novelty wears off, the drone returns, and now he wants to swap the “Husband – I” for the “Father – I.” We are constantly trying to “upgrade” the self – image through external roles. This is the search for Self – Acceptability

Duryodhana from the Mahābhārata wanted the kingdom not just for the land, but because, without the kingdom, he could not accept himself. He felt “small” in the presence of the Pāṇḍavas. He needed a crown to feel equal. But as the teaching reminds us: If you require a kingdom to be acceptable to yourself, you are not truly acceptable to yourself in the first place, and any such pursuits are an exercise in total futility.

4. The “Roles and Holes” Paradox

When a person takes up a role, they immediately create the possibility of problems, because the role is finite and thus inherently imperfect. The father, identified with his role, sees the “holes” – the loss of temper, the absence – and feels personal failure. The professional, identified with their career, sees the “holes” of missed opportunities. The source of all such suffering is Superimposition: the ‘Person’ (the true self) becomes suffocated by the ‘Role’ they have adopted.

The person seeks to fulfil an absolute, universal purpose through a relative, limited role. Because the person is identified with the role, when the role inevitably fails (the business collapses, the child is rebellious), the person concludes, “I have failed.” We have mistaken the temporary costume for the eternal actor. All suffering is a role problem, arising from the person’s identification with a limited part and the subsequent attempt to achieve an unlimited purpose through it.

II. The Diagnosis: Why the World Cannot Fulfil

Having understood that the problem is not what we seek, but the chronic status of the “wanter” within us. Most of us operate on a simple assumption: “I am currently incomplete, but if I add enough of the right things – wealth, status, knowledge, relationships – I will eventually become complete.”

In this section, we will use the Vedānta Pramāṇa to perform a “surgical” diagnosis of this strategy. We will see that seeking the infinite through the finite is not just difficult; it is a mathematical and existential impossibility.

1. The Three Defects of Objects (Doṣas)

Why do objects fail us so consistently? Vedānta classifies all worldly gains as having three intrinsic “manufacturing defects.” Until you see these defects, you will continue to be a “blind consumer” of experiences.

  • i. Duḥkha – Miśritatvam (Mixed with Pain): Every finite gain is like a rose. It is beautiful to look at, but it has a thorn behind it. In the Vedāntic vision, the “thorn” is threefold: there is pain in acquiring it, pain in preserving it (fear of loss), and the greatest pain in its inevitable loss.
  • ii. Atṛptikaratvam (Dissatisfaction through Comparison): This is the defect of Atiśaya. No matter what you have, there is always a “neighbour” with more. You buy a two-bedroom house, and you are happy until you see the three-bedroom house next door. Finite objects invite comparison, and comparison feeds the “wanting mind,” ensuring that contentment never arrives.
  • iii. Bandhakatvam (Dependency): This is the most subtle defect. Worldly comforts act as Crutches. The more you use them, the more your internal “legs” (self-reliance) atrophy. You become addicted to external conditions for your internal peace.
    Reframing wealth as a “crutch” transforms it from an asset into a potential liability; you have not gained strength; you have merely developed a dependency.

2. The Land-Runner’s Exhaustion: The Loss of the Enjoyer

To illustrate the futility of a life dedicated solely to accumulation, the tradition gives us the story of the Land – Runner. A man was offered as much land as he could circle on foot between sunrise and sunset. Driven by greed, he ran frantically, refusing to stop for water or rest. As the sun began to set, He wanted to capture the last fold of land through a final sprint but he collapsed and died.

Logic: He spent his entire life preparing to live, but he destroyed the enjoyer (himself) in the process. We are doing the same. We are so busy accumulating the means of living (Artha) that we have no time or health left to actually live. The “purpose” was to be happy, but the “method” has made happiness impossible.

3. The Stationary Cycle: Motion vs. Progress

Finally, we must distinguish between motion and progress. A person on a Stationary Cycle is pedalling intensely. They are sweating, their heart rate is up, and they feel like they are doing “hard work.” But at the end of an hour, the distance covered is zero.

Similarly, moving from one desire to the next is like the Stapler Metaphor. In a stapler, as soon as you press one pin down, the next one is automatically spring-loaded into position. Our mind is a “desire-stapler.” We think, “If I just finish this one task, I will be free,” but the structure of the mind ensures that the next desire is already waiting.

We are travelling from “finite to finite.” This is motion, but it is not progress toward the purpose of life. To find the “infinite,” we don’t need to pedal harder; we need to get off the bike and change our entire Vision. Vedanta gives you that vision.

III. The Solution: Knowing Your True Nature as the Ultimate End (Mokṣa)

In the Vedāntic tradition, we do not offer you a new “purpose” to achieve. Instead, we reveal that the purpose of life is the discovery of a pre – existing fact that you have always been what you have been seeking. More than what you can ever want is what you already are. Vedanta gives you a vision which swallows the desiring you and shows you that what you have been desiring all along, you already are.

1. Redefining Freedom: From Seeking to the Seeker

Most people look at “Freedom” (Mokṣa) as a destination – a place to go or a state to achieve after death or long meditation. However, using Vedānta as a Pramāṇa (means of knowledge), we redefine it:

Mokṣa is not freedom for the seeker; it is freedom from being the seeker.

When you seek security, what you are actually seeking is “freedom from being insecure.” This is clearly evident from the fact that when the object of desire like buying a house or building a business, is achieved the person no longer feels insecure. Until he again desires security.  HUman beings are fully satiated by the second serving of dessert only until they are presented with another serving of pudding. When you seek pleasantness, you are actually seeking freedom from the “displeased person”. If you are already free, but you continue to seek freedom, the only problem is Ignorance. You are like a person who is wearing their glasses on their forehead and running around the house searching for them. No amount of “search” will work; only “recognising” will.

2. The Tenth Man: The Seeker is the Sought

To expose the error of looking “out there” for purpose, we use the story of the Tenth Man.

Ten students crossed a turbulent river. Upon reaching the other side, the leader began to count to ensure everyone was safe. He counted: “One, two, three… nine.” He cried out, “The tenth man is drowned!” Each student counted, and each arrived at the number nine. They began to wail in grief.

A passerby arrived and asked the cause of their sorrow. He immediately saw the error. He didn’t go into the river to find a body; he didn’t perform a miracle. He simply made them stand in a line and told the leader to count again. As the leader reached “nine,” the passerby pointed at the leader and said: “Tat Tvam Asi” – You are that tenth man.

  • The Logic: The grief was real, but the cause was a “counting error.” The tenth man was never lost; he was simply non – recognized. Similarly, the “Fullness” (Pūrṇatva) you seek is the very nature of the one who is searching. The one who wants to be free is the freedom itself.

3. You have always been free

Vedanta’s teaching consistently emphasises the fundamental truth that you have always been free. This fact is often missed due to ignorance. The various teachings, methodologies, examples, metaphors, scriptural references (shastra), and preparatory practices (Prakriyas) are all tools designed to help you realise this. The core process for a seeker of truth or a student of Vedanta involves not just knowing at a verbal level, but fully understanding, grasping, and assimilating the meaning of this fact: all that you have been seeking is what you already are.  That more than what you can ever want is what you already are.

IV The vision of Vedanta.

The fact that you are already seeking, that you are the solution for your assumed problems, is to be known through systematic study, and for this, Vedanta works uniquely.

1. Vedānta as Pramāṇa: The Mirror of Words

If the truth is so close, why can’t I see it through meditation?

  • The Mirror Analogy: You have eyes, and your eyes can see the entire world. But there is one thing your eyes can never see directly: themselves. If you want to see your own eyes, you need an external instrument – a Mirror.
  • The Logic: Logic and personal experience are like telescopes or microscopes; they are great for studying the objective universe (Anātmā). But the Subject (Ātmā) cannot be turned into an object of observation. Vedānta is the unique “Word – Mirror” (Śabda Pramāṇa). When you look into the words of the Upaniṣad, they don’t give you a new “experience”; they reflect your own nature to you, correcting your mistaken identity.

2. From Triangular to Binary: The Fundamental Shift

Most of us operate in what is called the Triangular Format. In this view, there are three distinct entities:

  1. Jīva (Me): A small, weak, insecure individual.
  2. Jagat (The World): A vast, unpredictable source of problems (the “Victimiser”).
  3. Īśvara (God): A distant power I pray to for help (the “Saviour”).

In this triangle, you are a “victim” looking for a “saviour” from a “victimiser.” As long as you stay in this format, liberation is impossible. Why? Because the very definition of a “Jīva” is someone limited. You cannot be a “liberated Jīva” any more than you can be a “married bachelor.” To find freedom, you must transcend the Jīva-status entirely.

The teaching shifts you into the Binary Format: Ātmā (The Reality) and Anātmā (The Appearance). In this format, you are no longer a person in the world; you are the Reality (Satyam) in which the world (Mithyā) appears. The purpose of life shifts from “fixing the triangle” to “recognising the Real.”

Though the world is experienced, prompting the label “Binary,” Vedānta asserts that the true nature is “Unitary” because the world, like a dream, lacks independent existence and is merely the one reality (Satya vastu), which is you, the Ātman, appearing as the individual self (Jīva), God (Īśvara), and the world (Jagat). Since these appearances are Mithyā (having no reality of their own), they do not truly count, revealing that the Jīva and Īśvara are essentially the non-dual consciousness-existence-bliss (Sat-cit-ānanda Ātman).

3. Adhyāropa – Apavāda: The Scaffolding Method

How does a teacher move a student from the Triangle to the Binary? We use the method of Adhyāropa – Apavāda (Superimposition and Negation). This is often called the Scaffolding Method.

When you build a house, you first set up wooden scaffolding. You need it to reach the ceiling, but the scaffolding is not the house. Once the ceiling is set, the scaffolding is removed.

Similarly, the Śāstra first accepts your assumption that the world is real and God created it (Adhyāropa). It gives you prayers and duties. But once your mind is steady, the Śāstra withdraws those concepts (Apavāda), revealing that there was never a “creation” separate from the “Creator,” and you are that very Reality.

  • The Hand and the Light: Imagine I want to show you “Invisible Light.” I can’t point to it directly. So, I hold up my hand. I ask you to look at the hand (Adhyāropa). Then I point out the light reflecting upon the hand. Finally, I ask you to focus on the light and ignore the hand (Apavāda). I used the tangible (hand/world) to reveal the intangible (light/Consciousness).
  • The Pot and the Clay: I hold up a pot. I accept it as a “pot” for transaction (Adhyāropa). But then I ask, “What is the weight of the pot? It is the weight of the clay. What is the touch? It is the touch of the clay.” Eventually, I negate the “pot” as a separate reality and reveal it is only Clay + Name and Form. Similarly, you, as a Jiva, should negate your separate identity of “potness” and claim your original identity of SatChitAnanda, the “clay” (the essence of the entire universe)

Resolution of the purpose-seeking individual

Once the teaching is imbibed and assimilated through systematic study and deep reflection, the question “What is the purpose of my life?” dissolves because the “Seeker” has dissolved. The purpose seeking I is seen as Mithya, while you, as consciousness, are the only reality. The teaching has succeeded not by giving you a new thing to do, but by removing the ignorance that made you think you were a “wanter” in the first place. You are the Tenth Man. You are the Fullness you were looking for.

The struggle is over. The “Tamburā of Wanting” has been silenced, replaced by the steady, silent realisation: Aham Brahma Asmi – I am the Limitless Whole.